Labor To Clean Up Parliament With ‘Honesty Reforms’

An Andrews Labor Government will introduce historic reforms to clean up the conduct of the Parliament – saving time, saving taxpayer dollars and making Ministers more accountable and honest.

Under the Liberals, the Parliament has become a circus. Even traditional institutions like Question Time have been abused and misused for political gain, with Ministers hiding behind antiquated rules to avoid scrutiny.

Labor’s 11-point-plan to reform Parliament will abolish ‘Dorothy Dixers’, a stage-managed practice whereby Ministers pre-prepare questions and rehearse answers for the purposes of grandstanding.

Labor will also give the Speaker and the President the power to determine that a Minister’s answer is ‘non-responsive’ or irrelevant to the question that was asked, requiring the Minister to provide a written response.

The ability for Opposition Members to ask supplementary, or follow up, questions will be

Time limits for answers during Question Time will also be reduced, to discourage political grandstanding and allow for more questions during the 60-minute period.

The ‘Consideration in Detail’ stage will be introduced as a standard feature to enhance

Among the other changes to make the Parliament’s time more productive, verbal Notices of Motion – which are considered an inefficient way to conduct business – will be replaced in most cases by written notices.

Labor’s changes will help Victorians trust their Parliament, after four years of chaos, confusion and cover-ups under the Napthine Government. It’s about raising the standard of behaviour and making our Parliament honest again.

Quotes attributable to Mr Pakula:

 “The Parliament should be home to democracy and honesty, not Liberal chaos and political cover ups.”

“Under Labor, Ministers will no longer be able to hide behind stuffy rules, waste time grandstanding or sneak through changes in the dead of night.”

“Victorians have lost faith under the Liberals, but Labor will make our Parliament honest

Key Facts

Labor’s 11-point reform plan will:

  • Introduce supplementary questions in the Legislative
  • Abolish Dorothy Dixer questions in both chambers, instead
    providing Ministers with the ability to make two minute Ministerial Statements
    where new initiatives, projects and achievements can be briefly explained or
  • Reduce time limits for answers to questions. For the
    substantive questions, three minutes, and for the supplementary questions, one
  • Ensure that Government Members are still able to raise
    questions to Ministers on behalf of their electorates. At the conclusion of
    Question Time, both Government and Opposition Members will be able to ask
    questions of Ministers, the answers to which will be provided on
  • Provide the Speaker and the President with the power to
    find that a Minister’s answer has been non responsive to the question and to
    require the Minister to provide a written response – to the satisfaction of the
    Presiding Officer – by the next sitting day.
  • Abolish verbal Notices of Motion, to be replaced with
    written Notices of Motion provided to the Presiding Officer. Motions will be
    able to be read out only if they are brought on for
  • Introduce a 30-day time limit for the answering of
    Questions on Notice and enforce the 30 day time limit for Adjournments response
    in the Legislative Assembly.
  • Make Consideration in Detail (committee stage) a standard
    feature for the passage of Bills in the Legislative Assembly (as it is in the
    Council). Labor will give consideration to the creation of a Legislative
    Assembly Committee Room for the purpose of the detailed consideration of
  • Provide a non-Government chair for the Accountability and
    Oversight Committee of the Parliament.
  • Review sessional and standing orders, looking at a range of
    other matters including sitting hours and the scheduling of more time for MPs to
    raise matters on behalf of their communities in
  • Reform the Parliamentary Estimates and Accounts Committee
    to ensure that Budget hearings are more rigorous, akin to the Senate Estimates